Social media a ‘double-edged sword’ for politicians
Social media are a double-edged sword for campaigning politicians, warns one of Australia’s top media researchers.
In fact, social media are more likely to hinder than help a campaign when politicians write a bad tweet or Facebook post, said Associate Professor Axel Bruns of QUT’s ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation (CCI).
Professor Bruns’ research team is tracking the performance of current federal MPs, election candidates and their parties on Twitter.
But there’s a risk.
“Using social media is more likely to put politicians at a disadvantage if they make bad mistakes, which can quickly turn into major issues, especially once they’re picked up by mainstream media,” Professor Bruns said.
“So the penalties for a badly conceived tweet or post may be greater than the benefits of a good one.”
Leading in social media metrics does not always translate into more support for a politician, Professor Bruns said.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd currently has around 1.38 million Twitter followers compared to Opposition leader Tony Abbott’s 177,000.
Since the start of July, Rudd has been winning the @mention war, with almost 200,000 compared to Abbott’s 126,000.
“Despite Rudd’s lead in social media, he’s trailing in the polls,” Professor Bruns said.
“So he may be talked about more often than Abbott is on Twitter, but the tweets that mention him may have expressed disapproval as much as support for him.
“And the tide is turning: during week two of the campaign, Abbott received 5,000 more @mentions than Rudd.
“As opinion polls predict a Coalition government and after Abbott’s controversial statements about same-sex marriage, Twitter scrutiny of the Opposition leader may be on the increase.”
Professor Bruns said the Coalition is less active on Twitter than Rudd and Labor because the Coalition is leading in the polls.
From → News