Skip to content

Media Coverage Of the 2016 Presidential Election is An Absolute Joke

July 29, 2013

By Brian Jencunas

30f70b79ce557ecfc1895267bd4f8480Can pundits please stop talking about 2016? The election is more than three years away, and there’s nothing meaningful to report about who will be the next president.

Lack of newsworthiness hasn’t stopped almost every major news source from breathlessly reporting on polls and rumors about the 2016 candidates, none of whom have officially announced they are running. Right now, Hillary Clinton eating lunch with Barack Obama is being treated like a major news story. The Christian Science Monitor, ostensibly a serious news outlet, is offering its readers “three theories” about what the lunch means.

Journalism (which should really be called empty bloviating) about the faraway election is a confession by pundits that they need horserace coverage like a junkie needs heroin.

Pointless campaign reporting is not a new addiction for the national media. Every modern election has early media favorites, but they often choose not to run and they rarely win their party’s primary, much less the presidency.

In 1973, Jimmy Carter’s presidential campaign existed only in the mind of Carter himself and a few close advisers. In the wake of Richard Nixon’s 49-state landslide re-election, pundits thought the Democrats would either run another liberal – Ted Kennedy or Hubert Humphrey – or wise up from their defeat and choose an electable conservative like Henry “Scoop” Jackson. Kennedy and Humphrey chose not to run, and Jackson didn’t win a single primary.

In 1985, tout le monde knew that Gary Hart was destined to be the Democrat’s 1988 presidential candidate. After all, Hart had emerged from nowhere in ’84 and almost beaten Walter Mondale for the Democratic nomination. Early polling showed Hart had a double digit lead against his closest opponent – Chrysler CEO Lee Iacocca. Of course Hart didn’t win, since a sex scandal forced him out of the race, and Iacocca never even entered the election.

In 2005, everybody who was anybody knew that the ’08 campaign was between Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani. Clinton was riding high. Her husband was the most popular living president and her work in the Senate kept her in the national spotlight. Giuliani was the heroic mayor of New York who won the nation’s heart after 9/11. Compared to those two, Barack Obama didn’t stand a chance.

Early predictions are unreliable because nobody knows what the next presidential campaign will be about. In 1973, nobody could have guessed that Nixon would resign the presidency and Carter would be able to focus his campaign on honesty and his role as a Washington outsider. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina hadn’t happened, George W. Bush was still popular, and the economy was doing splendidly. None of this was true when the 2008 campaign began, which made Americans more receptive to Obama’s post-partisan message.

To be fair, the early favorite does occasionally end up winning. Reagan was the GOP’s nominee-in-waiting after 1976. In 2000, both Al Gore and Bush were early favorites. But with such a bad track record, political prognosticating this far away from an election is a terrible use of reporters’ time.

There are important issues at stake in Washington. Another fight over the debt ceiling is looming, some Republicans are threatening a government shutdown to defund Obamacare, and Congress is debating major changes to immigration policy. Relentless coverage of the 2016 election takes time away from those important issues, and leaves the public ill-served. Read more in Policymic.

From → Commentary

  1. Obama only won because the media left their little darling Hillary at the altar because they wanted a Black president. Otherwise they would have hyped Hillary and she would have won. Come 2016 they will refuse to mention any of Hillary’s numerous flaws and crimes. I’m guess they hype a Republican candidate that she can easily beat, like Romney last time. Then once that Republican has the nominee they crucify him while praising Hillary…

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Media Coverage Of the 2016 Presidential Election is An Absolute Joke |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s