Skip to content

Media bias infuriates Egyptian moderates

July 16, 2013

By Linda S. Heard

When it comes to reporting or editorialising fast-moving events taking place in Egypt, foreign news media has shredded all pretence of balance.

Indeed, in all my long years as a columnist, I have never witnessed such an appalling abandonment of journalistic norms and deliberate skewing of facts. There’s a concerted media assault on the wishes of the millions who took to the streets on June 30 to rid their country of a president leading his country towards economic and social suicide.

Those who came together from all walks of life to rescue the nation were worried individuals convinced that if Mohammad Mursi was permitted to serve out his term, Egypt’s very identity would be irrevocably erased. But rather than portray the celebratory atmosphere enjoyed by the majority, US and British news outlets were quick to label the president’s ousting ‘a coup’ — and have been crying foul ever since.

CNN’s bias in favour of the Muslim Brotherhood’s supporters gathered in Rabaa Adawiya to demand Mursi’s reinstatement hasn’t been lost on the crowds in Tahrir who believe they’ve pressed the reset button on January 25, 2011. Yet, CNN’s coverage has been overwhelmingly doom and gloom. I can’t count how many times its anchors stress upon Mursi’s status as ‘Egypt’s first democratically-elected president’, neglecting to mention that he forfeited his legitimacy the moment he illegally grabbed sweeping powers, appointed an Islamist-dominated Upper House and attacked the judiciary’s independence.

CNN’s pundits, so-called Middle East experts, have invariably been disposed towards the toppled leader and Brotherhood spokesman Jihad Al Haddad has been given the lion’s share of air-time. A few days ago, almost every CNN hourly news report featured an interview with Mursi’s son, Ahmad, who sent a morale-boosting message to his “Dad.”

And what a patriot he is! When Brotherhood stalwarts suggested he and his brother relinquish their American passports, they refused, citing personal freedom of choice. When an angry mob of Brotherhood supporters, many armed with Molotov cocktails, batons, swords and guns, attempted to storm the Republican Guard HQ resulting in death and injury, CNN’s guests cried massacre.

Strange that CNN avoided that term during the US-led occupation of Iraq. Wasn’t ‘Shock and Awe’ a massacre? Wasn’t the April 2004 siege of Fallujah carried out by US marines leaving over 700 dead, a massacre? The US military is massacring innocent Pakistanis and Afghans with its drone strikes today? Has CNN ever dared to term Israel’s onslaughts on Gaza or Lebanon ‘massacres’? As if to emphasise how dastardly Egypt’s security forces are, the channel has highlighted over and over the devastation of a mother whose son, a Brotherhood-sympathising photographer was shot in the head, allegedly by an army sniper. That’s fair enough! But why haven’t its reporters sought to interview the mothers of Egyptians murdered by Brotherhood thugs or the families of young policemen and soldiers killed? Read the rest of the column in Gulf News.


From → Commentary

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s